Prediction of Alejo Sanchez Quilez [594th] vs Oliver Bonding [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L W W L
Form
W W W W W L L W L LH2H: Quilez 1 - 0 Bonding
They have played 3 sets in total, with Quilez winning 2 and Bonding winning 1. The last match between Quilez and Bonding was at the M25 Les Franqueses del Valles, 15-03-2025, Second, Hard with Alejo Sanchez Quilez getting the victory 1-6 7-6(5) 12-10.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alejo Sanchez Quilez | 1 |
| Oliver Bonding | 0 |
| Quilez | Stats | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (10-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (7-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 594 | Ranking | N/A |
| 493 | Highest Rank | |
| 19 | Age | 17 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 56% (64-51) | Career Total W/L | 44% (8-10) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 7-6(5) 12-10 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 20 | Games Won | 22 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alejo Sanchez Quilez vs Oliver Bonding Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Quilez 1 - 0 Bonding
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Quilez has won 43.62% of points on their second serve, while Bonding has won 48.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Quilez, in recent form, has won 48.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bonding has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.86% and 26.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Quilez has saved 52.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bonding has saved 52.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Quilez has won 50.75% of matches played (W/L 34/ 33), with Bonding winning 44.44% (W/L 8/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Quilez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 37/ 33). Bonding has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Quilez has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.94% of matches (W/L 27/ 26), where as Bonding has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 8/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Quilez winning 1 times and Bonding being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Quilez winning 2 and Bonding winning 1. The last match between Quilez and Bonding was at the M25 Les Franqueses del Valles, 15-03-2025, Second, Hard with Alejo Sanchez Quilez getting the victory 1-6 7-6(5) 12-10.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Quilez and Bonding have played a deciding set 1 times, with Quilez winning 1 times and Bonding 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Quilez winning 1, and Bonding 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Quilez has played against opponents with an average rank of 242.94 while Bonding has played against players with an average rank of 124.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Quilez has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bonding has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Quilez has converted 40.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bonding has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Alejo Sanchez Quilez vs Oliver Bonding Best Odds For The Match
Alejo Sanchez Quilez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
Player
Iliyan Radulov
71%
(
96 of
135)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
115)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
59 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
131
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
Player
Nicolas Rafael Goldberg Alviani
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
Player
Jorge Plans
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-0 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
53%
(
56 of
105)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
117)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
117)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
82 of
117)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
9 of
24)
Break Points Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
53%
(
54 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
64 of
117)
111
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
Player
Alex Martinez
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
4
Total Points Won
2
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Oliver Bonding Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matisse Bobichon
Player
Oliver Bonding
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Oliver Bonding
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Pierre Delage
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miles Jones
Player
Oliver Bonding
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 1-6 7-6(5) 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Ian Luca Cervantes Tomas
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Axel Garcian
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
15 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Emile Hudd
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Pierre Antoine Faut
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Thomas Deschamps
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Quilez vs Bonding?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Quilez Vs Bonding is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (64/51) | Win/Loss | 44% (8/10) |
| 52% (136/124) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (20/21) |
| 51% (1223/1197) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (200/219) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 140 | Aces Total | 68 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 266 | Total Double Faults | 34 |
| 1:40:42 | Average Match Time | 1:42:33 |
| 215.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 124.28 |
| 57% (4231/7388) | 1st Serve % | 59% (686/1164) |
| 64% (2711/4231) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (444/686) |
| 47% (1491/3157) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (248/478) |
| 46% (378/816) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (39/89) |
| 43% (3146/7296) | Return Points Win % | 37% (427/1147) |
| 54% (60/111) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (19/27) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (7/11) |
| 67% (20/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 88% (60/53) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 70% (10/7) |
| 12% (60/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 30% (10/3) |
| 20% (55/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (8/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
